Wednesday, December 08, 2004

Fairness for All?

CNA
Monday December 6, 2:17 AM

PM Lee outlines vision for Singapore and PAP
SINGAPORE : Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has said his vision for Singapore is a small but great nation, and a land of opportunity for all. He called on all Singaporeans to embark on this new national project together.
Mr Lee was speaking to party members in a rally to celebrate the People's Action Party (PAP) 50th anniversary.
Speaking for the first time as PAP's Secretary General, Mr Lee outlined his vision for the party and the nation.
Mr Lee said: "It should be a land of opportunity, a place everyone has full and equal opportunities to be educated to the limits of his ability.
"It would be a country where everyone is treated fairly regardless of race, language or religion...an economy where rewards depend on your ability and your effort...and for those people with drive, imagination, the ability, who can create something new - with some talent, the sky is the limit."
Mr Lee also referred to the recent Singapore Idol contest to stress his point.
"Taufik and Sylvester - a year ago no one knew them but they had talent and grit. They won Singaporeans' hearts and won contest, they were finalists.
"Taufik's mother is a cleaner and was not able to attend many performances as she worked long hours, but from that background and his ability and talent, Singaporeans recognised it and you can organise your friends to vote for your favourites. But in the end, the right man won...so Singapore must be a land of opportunity for all of us."


Everyone treated fairly? I doubt so. Ft and those who are rich and have connections are treated preferentially. I can give one classic example. A few years ago, a female ft lawyer was acquitted of causing the deaths of a family of 3, a mother and her two young children, in a car accident. Her defence? Something to the effect that the victims were in her blind spot. A very farfetched defence considering under Singapore traffic law, a motorist is deemed to have committed an offence if he knocks, injures or kills anyone regardless of the condition or situation in which the accident takes place. That means to say if a kid dashes out of nowhere to pick his toy and a motorist knocks onto him, the motorist is considered to be at fault. So, why was the ft lawyer acquitted?

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home